<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>#DigitalJournalism on Home</title>
    <link>https://yakinin.com/en/tags/%23digitaljournalism/</link>
    <description>Recent content in #DigitalJournalism on Home</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.148.2</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:09:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://yakinin.com/en/tags/%23digitaljournalism/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>How Often Do AI Search Engines Get It Wrong? A Sobering Look at the Data</title>
      <link>https://yakinin.com/en/posts/20253107-ai-search-accuracy-study/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://yakinin.com/en/posts/20253107-ai-search-accuracy-study/</guid>
      <description>&lt;div style=&#34;display: flex; justify-content: center; gap: 1em; flex-wrap: wrap;&#34;&gt;
  &lt;img src=&#34;https://yakinin.com/img/20253107-ai-search-accuracy-study-0.jpg&#34; style=&#34;max-width: 350px; width: 100%;&#34; /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A recent study by the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University delivered a stark reality check on the current state of AI-driven search. The findings are a critical reminder that while generative AI is advancing at an incredible pace, its reliability in retrieving and citing factual information is still deeply flawed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers tested eight leading AI search systems, including prominent models like ChatGPT and Google&amp;rsquo;s Gemini. The results demonstrate a significant gap between capability and accuracy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
